Discussion:
250W MH bulb with 400W ballast
(too old to reply)
Hiking
2005-02-23 22:08:04 UTC
Permalink
Hello all,

One of our guys went to service a fixture and noticed that someone had
put a 250W bulb in a fixture which had a 400W ballast, now the guys here
are arguing about whether or not the bulb or ballast will have a
shortened life expectancy.

What do you think? If a 250W bulb is put in a Holophane fixture with a
400W Metal Halide ballast, is the 250W bulb going to die prematurely?
What about the ballast?

Remember that we are not just talking about just a purely resistive load
here.

Thanks.
JohnR66
2005-02-24 01:43:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hiking
Hello all,
One of our guys went to service a fixture and noticed that someone had put
a 250W bulb in a fixture which had a 400W ballast, now the guys here are
arguing about whether or not the bulb or ballast will have a shortened
life expectancy.
What do you think? If a 250W bulb is put in a Holophane fixture with a
400W Metal Halide ballast, is the 250W bulb going to die prematurely? What
about the ballast?
Remember that we are not just talking about just a purely resistive load
here.
Thanks.
It is certainly not a good thing for either of them.
John
PCK
2005-02-24 10:29:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by JohnR66
Post by Hiking
Hello all,
One of our guys went to service a fixture and noticed that someone had
put a 250W bulb in a fixture which had a 400W ballast, now the guys here
are arguing about whether or not the bulb or ballast will have a
shortened life expectancy.
What do you think? If a 250W bulb is put in a Holophane fixture with a
400W Metal Halide ballast, is the 250W bulb going to die prematurely?
What about the ballast?
Remember that we are not just talking about just a purely resistive load
here.
Thanks.
It is certainly not a good thing for either of them.
John
maybe not but i work on old GE building that is filled with the proto type
HPS
some three wire igniters are hand built then clear coated with epoxy others
look more typical.
seems the GE electricians didn`t care what bulb went where. i find 250 watt
and 400 watt mixed and have replaced them with 250`s. the bulb life didnt
seem
to be affected but the ballasts are really large, much more copper than they
use
these days. some seem to be around 30 years old original ballasts
Hiking
2005-02-24 14:55:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hiking
Hello all,
One of our guys went to service a fixture and noticed that someone had
put a 250W bulb in a fixture which had a 400W ballast, now the guys here
are arguing about whether or not the bulb or ballast will have a
shortened life expectancy.
What do you think? If a 250W bulb is put in a Holophane fixture with a
400W Metal Halide ballast, is the 250W bulb going to die prematurely?
What about the ballast?
Remember that we are not just talking about just a purely resistive load
here.
Thanks.
Since this is an "Engineering" forum, I'd hoped for a bit of engineering
insight... no one here does engineering work in this ballast/bulb industry?
JohnR66
2005-02-25 01:56:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hiking
Post by Hiking
Hello all,
One of our guys went to service a fixture and noticed that someone had
put a 250W bulb in a fixture which had a 400W ballast, now the guys here
are arguing about whether or not the bulb or ballast will have a
shortened life expectancy.
What do you think? If a 250W bulb is put in a Holophane fixture with a
400W Metal Halide ballast, is the 250W bulb going to die prematurely?
What about the ballast?
Remember that we are not just talking about just a purely resistive load
here.
Thanks.
Since this is an "Engineering" forum, I'd hoped for a bit of engineering
insight... no one here does engineering work in this ballast/bulb industry?
You need to post this in sci.engr.lighting. You will get very good answers.
Many have in-depth ballast design knowledge.
John
Hiking
2005-02-25 13:39:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by JohnR66
Post by Hiking
Post by Hiking
Hello all,
One of our guys went to service a fixture and noticed that someone had
put a 250W bulb in a fixture which had a 400W ballast, now the guys here
are arguing about whether or not the bulb or ballast will have a
shortened life expectancy.
What do you think? If a 250W bulb is put in a Holophane fixture with a
400W Metal Halide ballast, is the 250W bulb going to die prematurely?
What about the ballast?
Remember that we are not just talking about just a purely resistive load
here.
Thanks.
Since this is an "Engineering" forum, I'd hoped for a bit of engineering
insight... no one here does engineering work in this ballast/bulb industry?
You need to post this in sci.engr.lighting. You will get very good answers.
Many have in-depth ballast design knowledge.
John
Exactly the info I needed. While the guys here at the shop will not
care the slightest about what's at issue with this, I want to know just
for the sake of satisfying my curiosity. Thanks John.
SQLit
2005-02-24 15:23:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hiking
Hello all,
One of our guys went to service a fixture and noticed that someone had
put a 250W bulb in a fixture which had a 400W ballast, now the guys here
are arguing about whether or not the bulb or ballast will have a
shortened life expectancy.
What do you think? If a 250W bulb is put in a Holophane fixture with a
400W Metal Halide ballast, is the 250W bulb going to die prematurely?
What about the ballast?
Remember that we are not just talking about just a purely resistive load
here.
Thanks.
I have seen it lots of times. The only difference is the lamp is acting like
a current limiting fuse. The 400 watt ballast has more amps than is needed
for the lamp. I have never really paid much attention to this, I just
replaced the lamp with one that matches the ballast when I find it.
JohnR66
2005-02-25 02:16:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by SQLit
Post by Hiking
Hello all,
One of our guys went to service a fixture and noticed that someone had
put a 250W bulb in a fixture which had a 400W ballast, now the guys here
are arguing about whether or not the bulb or ballast will have a
shortened life expectancy.
What do you think? If a 250W bulb is put in a Holophane fixture with a
400W Metal Halide ballast, is the 250W bulb going to die prematurely?
What about the ballast?
Remember that we are not just talking about just a purely resistive load
here.
Thanks.
I have seen it lots of times. The only difference is the lamp is acting like
a current limiting fuse. The 400 watt ballast has more amps than is needed
for the lamp. I have never really paid much attention to this, I just
replaced the lamp with one that matches the ballast when I find it.
This is not entirely true. The ballast behaves as a constant current device.
The lamp will take as much current as it can before it melts down or
explodes without a ballast (not considering starting issues, of course).
Consider the nature of electric arcs. The ballast keeps the current stable
for the arc. The current and, perhaps the voltage characteristics are
different for 250 and 400 watt MH lamps. Runing a 250W bulb with a 400W
ballast will certainly shortent the life of the bulb. It could effect the
ballast as well but to a lesser extent.
John
John Gilmer
2005-02-27 03:21:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by JohnR66
This is not entirely true. The ballast behaves as a constant current device.
Nah!

The ballast usually acts just a "reactance!"

The lamp acts like a "constant voltage" sink.

The ballast supplies so much current for a given voltage drop. A high
wattage ballast will have less inductance.

The interesting question (which I can't answer) is "How does the arc voltage
on a lamp change when the lamp runs 'hot?'" Since the 250 watt lamp didn't
self-destruct I suspect that hotter arcs run at slightly higher voltages.
Paul Hovnanian P.E.
2005-02-28 00:51:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by JohnR66
Post by JohnR66
This is not entirely true. The ballast behaves as a constant current
device.
Nah!
The ballast usually acts just a "reactance!"
The lamp acts like a "constant voltage" sink.
The ballast supplies so much current for a given voltage drop. A high
wattage ballast will have less inductance.
The interesting question (which I can't answer) is "How does the arc voltage
on a lamp change when the lamp runs 'hot?'" Since the 250 watt lamp didn't
self-destruct I suspect that hotter arcs run at slightly higher voltages.
I think its the other way around. Higher plasma temps have lower
'resistance' (or higher currents). That's why arc type lamps need
ballasts in the first place.

For a given bulb chemistry, operating at its design temperature, the arc
voltages will be similar across different wattage bulbs. The variable is
arc current (higher for higher wattage bulbs), so a ballast is designed
to regulate a certain arc current, depending on bulb rating. Put in a
smaller wattage bulb and the (too high) arc current will erode the
electrodes and shorten the bulb's life.
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:***@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
It's easier said than done.
... and if you don't believe it, try proving that it's easier done than
said, and you'll see that it's easier said that `it's easier done than
said' than it is done, which really proves that it's easier said than
done.
JohnR66
2005-03-05 15:00:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by JohnR66
Post by JohnR66
This is not entirely true. The ballast behaves as a constant current
device.
Nah!
The ballast usually acts just a "reactance!"
The lamp acts like a "constant voltage" sink.
The ballast supplies so much current for a given voltage drop. A high
wattage ballast will have less inductance.
The interesting question (which I can't answer) is "How does the arc voltage
on a lamp change when the lamp runs 'hot?'" Since the 250 watt lamp didn't
self-destruct I suspect that hotter arcs run at slightly higher voltages.
You have many misconceptions about how an arc lamp operates. The ballast
behaves as a constant current source. Not a simple resistance! A hotter arc
is more conductive. This is main reason there is a ballast! Without the
ballast, the lamp would draw so much current it could explode or trip
current protection devices.

John
Bud
2005-03-06 07:19:20 UTC
Permalink
Another example of the constant current property of a ballast - ballasts
used in flourescent lamps for signs are made for multiple tubes and are
rated for a range of total tube lengths (like 12-16 feet). The total
voltage across the tubes (they are essentially wired in series) is
proportional to the length. The ballast has to put out an essentially
constant current over the rated lengths.
---------------------
Quite a while ago I read about a lighting design for an athletic field
where the lamps (metal halide?) were intentionally a lower wattage than
the ballasts. The lamps put out more than their rated light but their
life was shortened. This was considered good economy because the lamps
were not used many hours per year and had a long practical life.
Post by JohnR66
You have many misconceptions about how an arc lamp operates. The ballast
behaves as a constant current source. Not a simple resistance! A hotter arc
is more conductive. This is main reason there is a ballast! Without the
ballast, the lamp would draw so much current it could explode or trip
current protection devices.
John
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...